Talk:Dyrham Park

Dyrham Park has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 28, 2016. (Reviewed version).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gloucestershire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

A fact from Dyrham Park appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 September 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the grounds of Dyrham Park (pictured) include an emparkment granted in 1511 and still populated by fallow deer?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dyrham Park.

Wikipedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dyrham Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 06:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to take on this review and will study the article in detail shortly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First reading[edit]

In general this article looks fine, but there are some tweaks needed in the first half, the second half being better!

"The first lord of the manor to be resident my have been William Denys" - typo

Done.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Esquire of the Body to the king" - Which king?

Henry VIII added.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"The estate was bought by by William Blathwayt," - two "by"s, and do you know the date for the purchase?

"by" sorted & acquired by marriage in 1689.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"by from the terrace to the grounds." - Error.

Sorted.— Rod ^talk

"The east front of 1704 from William Talman, architect of Chatsworth." - No verb in this sentence.

was designed by.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"The gardens were designed by George London in the late 17th and early 18th centuries." - This sentence is out of place, sandwiched between information on the house interior, and should be moved.

Moved.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"While this was underway visitors could view the house from a rooftop walkway." --> "While the repairs were in progress, visitors could view the house from a rooftop walkway."

Thanks - changed to your version.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"fronted by an Italianate double staircase." - I'm not sure about this, it doesn't seem to be in the source, and "fronted by" sounds as if it is external to the building. The Historic England sources are very difficult to interpret.

Reworded.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You move straight from a description of the exterior to the contents of the house. It would be nice to have a bit about the interior, but I am not demanding this as there is no requirement for a GA to be comprehensive.

There is not much in the sources but added a sentence.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the caption for the image of the royal licence, "affixed thereto" is a bit archaic.

Changed to attached.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's all for now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting my errors. I have (hopefully) adressed these comments.— Rod ^talk 09:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy with the improvements made and think this article reaches the GA criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dyrham Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160918152135/https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/dyrham-park/features/school-summer-holidays-at-dyrham-park to https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/dyrham-park/features/school-summer-holidays-at-dyrham-park

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]