Talk:Early Founders Memorial Stone/GA1

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 10, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass

2. Factually accurate?: Pass

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass

 If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.

Having read the article it is well written and easy to understand, from the in line referencing and random checing of some of these references they seem correct. The Article does cover the topic to give me an insight into a before unknown topic providing me with a concise history and overview. The Article is written from a neutral point of view and not like an advert.

I have checked the article history and I am satisfied that there are no ongoing edit wars, with images all properly liscenced.

Congratulations, I have passed this article and added it to the Good articles list.

Thank you for your review and the speedy passing of this short & interesting article to GA status mate. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 00:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)