Jump to content

Talk:EastCare

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ideas for improvements

[edit]

This is a good article, in my opinion. The only reason why I rated it above as not meeting class B criteria was that the style is quite informal in places, and there are some lists of peoples' names that I think would be better placed in collapsible tables or left out altogether. Falconusp t c 17:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give examples? I've gone with the mentality that the more information the better. But I would like to get this article to B or GA status. It helps A LOT to have fresh eyes. Thanks, PGPirate 03:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, the sentence "Mike McGinnis was the first chief flight nurse, while Mary Jo Bankhead, Alena Bramble, Dolly Bryan, Pam Demaree, Betty Harris, Breda Hurdle, John Nelson and Cindy Raisor were all flight nurses. Willie Dykes, Perry Reynolds and Sam Ewing were the first pilots.[7]" has a lot of names. I think that those kinds of lists are better outside of a paragraph, either in a list, or in a table. I would recommend not listing them all in the article. The next example is "...apparent that the staff was very tired and needed replacing". That sounds a little informal to me, like a narrative, not an encyclopedia. Perhaps you could state instead that EastCare took over for the people that had been responding. Again, it is a very good article, and you should be proud of yourself. I am new at rating things, so perhaps I was being too nitpicky. If you make those changes, let me know, and I'll rate it again. Falconusp t c 03:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I made a table. Unsure if it will be too cluttered or what. But I think it helps the article flow better. Also went through and did some tidying up.PGPirate 23:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the wording of the tired & needs replacing sentence. Feel free to change it back if you don't like it. I have also upgraded to a B. I think I was grading hard earlier... The caveat remains that I am new at this, so it's possible somebody will come along and disagree. Falconusp t c 04:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it looks much better now. Thanks for the help! PGPirate 16:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on EastCare. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EastCare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on EastCare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]