Talk:East Aurora, New York

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

New York (state): Western NY Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Mid-importance).

History items[edit]

Some of the "history" items in this article need to be placed under some other header. Stepp-Wulf 00:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Done. 70.126.56.64 02:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the anon's new heading. If the information is trivial, why include it? I've rearranged the article a bit... most of that information is indeed relevant to the history of East Aurora. ~MDD 46 96 20:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Companies such as Fisher-Price and the Roycroft movement did have a lot to do with the development and the populating of the town, but nothing included in those paragraphs demonstrates or explains that; it's trivial information ripped from the town's website.70.126.56.64 22:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the information about Fisher-Price and the Roycroft movement is only there to describe how it impacted the growth and development of the town (although such information, if it has been documented somewhere, would be valuable). I see value in simply informing that reader of the notable historical items from the town. I would think that anyone who came across this article would be interested to know such information... perhaps that is trivia. How would you differentiate trivia from history? ~MDD 46 96 00:16, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Middle School[edit]

The heading under middle school sounds much like self promotion, and offers nothing origional to the article. I argue that it should be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.205.201.9 (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I agree to deletion or editing to remove extensive self-promotion. Stepp-Wulf 05:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Copyvio from http://www.eaur.wnyric.org/schools.cfm?subpage=533. Removed. ~MDD 46 96 12:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In addtion, Vidler's 5&10, while locally famous, is also a commercial enterprise. I'll live the link in for now.23:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stepp-Wulf (talk • contribs) 23:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on East Aurora, New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]