Talk:East Harptree

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

A new article has been started for Coley, Somerset. As this is a small hamlet within the parish of East Harptree and unlikely to have enough content to make a substantial article, I propose that it be merged into this article.— Rod ^talk 08:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose: I guess that if hamlets still have a name to them; then they have their own importance but if Coley has no importance whatsoever (not even a post box!) then I will support but I'll have a look into it first. Regards Jaguar (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Coley has a population of about 100 and that does make it somewhat notable for its own article, however the article itself is in question. It is only four sentences long and does not contain any places of interest nor does it have any other information so it might be better off being merged. Jaguar (talk) 18:27, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I live in East Harptree and Coley is considerably closer to Litton, so if the place should end up merging it should merge with Litton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovepickle (talk • contribs) 15:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I suggested merging with East Harptree is because that is the parish it falls within and therefore population and other published data relates to the parish.— Rod ^talk 16:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have now merged to East Harptree, but Coley could be mentioned in the Litton, Somerset article if that would be useful to readers.— Rod ^talk 18:46, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monument of Sir John Newton

I visited the church of St. Lawrence, East Harptree on 28 August 2016, and saw there the monument to Sir John Newton. The canopy is very much intact, despite what the caption on this page states. I'm happy to provide photographic reference, and to upload a picture I took of the monument to this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.101.1.119 (talk) 14:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. If you could upload the photo, perhaps under a suitable licence via the upload wizard at Commons, that would be really helpful.— Rod ^talk 15:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it took me so long. Here's my own photo of the monument in question:

and there's the supposedly missing canopy - unless I don't understand what a canopy is in this context. Blahrfengar (talk) 03:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've revised Church of St Laurence, East Harptree but I don't see the comment about the canopy in this article.— Rod ^talk 08:13, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Rod. On the East Harptree page, the monument with the caption mentioning that the canopy was destroyed is in kind of a set-in picture that shows up atthe right hand side of the "Governance" section. Blahrfengar (talk) 15:17, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - got it now. You can always make these changes yourself.— Rod ^talk 17:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I'm happy to do so. I'm kind of a newbie, so appreciate your patience. Is there any reason not to swap out that old drawing of the monument with my picture? I probably even have a better one than the example. Blahrfengar (talk) 03:07, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any problem with that - best to use the edit summary to explain modern photo or something similar.— Rod ^talk 08:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Harptree. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080130105206/http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_19950493_en_1.htm to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_19950493_en_1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on East Harptree. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]