Talk:East and West Blockhouses

East and West Blockhouses has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 3, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:East and West Blockhouses/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbox checks -- no dab/EL issues.

Structure -- logical/standard for this type of article.

Prose/content

Copyedited as usual, pls let me know any concerns.
"The West Blockhouse was destroyed in the 19th century..." -- "destroyed" sounds like a natural disaster or act of war, would "demolished" be more appropriate?
Following on, there are no visible remains of the West Blockhouse then?

Sources -- appear reliable and suitably formatted.

Images -- no licensing issues.

Another nice addition to the Device Fort series -- just a couple of points before I pass it, Hc. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Changes made as suggested. I think we're on the home straight now for the Device Forts... not that many left to get up to GA! :) Hchc2009 (talk) 17:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great -- passing this one. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

West Blockhouse confusion[edit]

I don't know how this was missed, it being a Good Article n'all, BUT West Blockhouse was demolished and replaced by West Blockhouse Fort at West Blockhouse Point and NOT by Dale Fort at Dale Head, which is about a mile further up the coast. The Dale Fort error is stated twice in the article, one with a reference by the Royal Commission on Ancient Monuments for Wales, which specifically mentions West Blockhouse Fort and doesn't mention Dale Fort at all. You would have thought that the clue was in the name, but we all make mistakes I suppose. Now amended. Alansplodge (talk) 18:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]