Talk:EasyGroup

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EasyGroup article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 June 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

ShimmerBright is closing... should this not be included?

Someone could add the easyMobile is a Mobile virtual network operator in the U.K. using T-Mobile as the real network.

You claim to not be employed by easygroup yet your edits demonstrate differently. You have included no information openly available on the net and chosen to only use marketing propaganda. eg: you include nothing about the court defeat of easyinternet by easynet and the intended closure of easyinternet you include nothing about the losses publically known running into hundreds of millions you include nothing about the closure of easycinema, the well publicised court case with orange mobile, the well publicised court case with richemont, you could have also chosen to include impact of cheap flights using old planes on global warming and the enviromnmental impact of the Labour government subsidising easyjet via favourable taxes at the expense of more efficient trains and cleaner trains. i am happy to make the necessary edits if you want and will quote sources and provide links politakis

Merge[edit]

I think EasyPizza should be merged into EasyGroup, as its just a small part of EasyGroup. Kevin_b_er 06:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a reasonable course of action. I don't see how this article could be expanded much beyond its stub state, and someone else has already expanded EasyGroup to go into stub-level detail of each of their businesses. That seems much more appropriate, so long as the businesses being covered in EasyGroup are notable and verifiable. lowercase 06:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have extracted the easyGroup related EasyPizza text and put it here: EasyPizza (easyGroup). 20:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Pizza[edit]

The quote says "Unlike most other delivery chains, easyPizza facilities store pre-made, frozen pizza". Is this accurate? From all the Pizza takeaways I visit, I would say only Dominos make their Pizza's fresh - everyone else seems to get them out of a freezer and put them in the pizza over, surely?

Having worked for Pizza Hut the dough is frozen, but the pizzas are NOT pre made (well, they are after a fasion, the dough is sourced and now and then toppings added, but only for speed. The pizzas DO NOT get pre made then frozen.

What a crappy thing. All the pizzerias here - I can just watch the dude roll the dough and slice me somee of thaat salami. That's some bullshit for you. I want me some real pizza. Don't you? I feel sorry for you, ahaha. Pseudoanon comments ftw.

easyPizza persist in delivering leaflets about their service with the local free paper to the whole of Milton Keynes, despite not delivering to more than about 60% of the town..

easyJet[edit]

Surely easyJet should be given more prominence in this article? Although it's now publicly listed (and thus largely independent of the rest of the group), it's still the most famous and most successful of the group's companies. Surely it deserves more than one sentence under History. Lincolnite 17:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why? It goes to a seperate entry which is more than detailed enough..

I agree with Lincolnite, looking at this article alone it appears that easyJet is not a significant part of easyGroup. It should be as prominent as say "easyBus" which provides a brief paragraph and a prominent link to the main article. I will add such a section. Halsteadk 16:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i've spotted a goof. In EasyHotel, Baudapest was said twice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.28.99.104 (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

easyCafe[edit]

The sentence "They may have up to a hundred terminals however at any given time many will be in poor shape or not functioning at all." is possibly slanderous.. evidence is needed (citation?) Matt.smart 12:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Anyone who has been to the easyInternet locatin in Times Square NYC(now closed)has more than enough evidence of easyInternet's poor service and use of thugs to enforce rules additionally easy's well known contention that restrooms are a 'value added service' makes me wonder why anyone would support them at all69.118.180.120 09:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

easyCar[edit]

Linking to one bad review from a punter and saying the company has customer service problems is hardly encyclopedic - every large company will get some complaints, and it is well established that people are more likely to break out their pen or their keyboard if they're unhappy than to give praise. There are also other similar reviews where praise has been given. (PS not sure why my previous edit on 14th is showing as adding this back in.) Halsteadk 12:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Easy theft[edit]

In The Netherlands the pre flight tax was abolished per july 1st 2009. All cariers that sold tickets before that date for a flight after that date have paid this tax back to their customers. Not so easyjet. Even after repaeted requests to do so they have taken the stand that since they are no longer required to pay this tax to the government they just keep it and so will steal if off their customers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.81.234.156 (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Easy.com[edit]

This site now also acts as the easyGroup main portal. Also? there seems to be no free email on there at all. This site now only acts as... ? --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 16:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a bit too much to have the brand guidelines here?[edit]

EasyGroup publishes brand guidelines for all Easy companies to follow, together with the company's brand values:[3]

great value taking on the big boys for the many not the few relentless innovation keep it simple, entrepreneurial making a difference in people’s lives honest, open, caring and fun — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNk22 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia is not a publicity service[edit]

Material in this article must comply with the normal standards expected of an encyclopedia. Material that is not supported by a third-party wp:reliable source will be deleted. See also wp:Wikipedia is not. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

EasyJet orange thin.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]