Talk:Eblaite language

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assyria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Mid‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistic affiliation?

Is it "closely related to Akkadian"?? The more widely-accepted view is that it's most closely related to Amorite and Ugaritic, and ultimately Canaanite. AnonMoos 03:26, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That was the most widespread view in the eighties, but scholarly opinion has since shifted. - Mustafaa 11:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

people who spoke the language

the article needs more info on the people who spoke the language. Gringo300 00:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this is a linguistic article and should only refer to another article about the human population of Ebla. (Taivo (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Evidence for East Semitic classification of Eblaite?

I have not seen the evidence that Eblaite is to be classified together with Akkadian as an East Semitic language. I have seen it classified elsewhere as a West or Northwest Semitic language. Giovanni Pettinato, who was responsible for deciphering Eblaite, classified it as West Semitic, noting, however, that a number of the Eblaite tablets were written in Akkadian. Wikipedia classifies Eblaite as East Semitic. Where is the evidence?

Jacob Davidson —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.68.95.65 (talk) 23:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it should not be classified strictly as East Semitic. I'm no archaeolinguist, but based solely on the articles and citations in both the English and French Wikipedia articles, Eblaite contains elements of multiple Semitic languages and would seem to defy being pigeonholed into either one of the East or West families. I've removed the East Semitic languages classification in the Infobox, which matches the heavily researched French article. KDF789 (talk) 19:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Translated tables from French Wikipedia

Hello fellow Wikipedians. I have translated most of the tables from the French Wikipedia. Though I do not know the French language, there are enough cognates in the technical linguistic vocabulary that I was able to translate the tables without any serious difficulty. Please feel free to edit them if I have made any mistakes or you see other issues with them.

Jamutaq (talk) 02:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]