Talk:Economy of Iceland

Iceland Top‑importance

	Iceland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

HID index out of place in the first sentence?

Might the HID index in the first sentence be out of place, when it's not specifically economic, but includes all of these:

Life expectancy, literacy, education, standard of living, and GDP per capita for countries worldwide. It is a standard means of measuring well-being, especially child welfare.

The economy of Iceland is small but well-developed (most developed in the world according to United Nations Human Development Index), with a gross domestic product estimated at US $ 12.172 billion (132nd of 227 countries) in 2005 (and a per capita GDP of $40,277, which is among the world's highest.) Doesn't have a nice flow.

Wouldn't GDP per capita or similar index be a more correct purely economically?

--212.242.32.164 (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ISK 100 note.jpg

Image:ISK 100 note.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ISK 100 note.jpg

Image:ISK 100 note.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Events for Iceland

412%? 712%? Really? The UK is pleased with 2%, and is slightly worried about the current rate. This seems very unlikely. Larklight (talk) 20:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

removed it for now.

"Iceland's economy continued to grow at a rapid pace in 2006, reaching an estimated rate of 412%. This brisk increase followed two earlier years of 712% growth per annum. The healthy gain was mainly based on investment in a 690-MW hydropower project at Kárahnjúkar, in the northeastern mountain region, and an aluminum plant built by Alcoa at Reyðarfjörður on the east coast. These two projects cost $3 billion–$3.5 billion over the construction period of three years and were to be completed in 2007, by which time the economy was expected to have slowed down. By February 2006 the exchange rate and share prices had fallen sharply in the wake of overheating of the economy and turbulence in the currency market. Share prices, however, recovered their loss in the latter half of the year." Larklight (talk) 20:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

maybe 4.12% and 7.12%? 82.17.48.222 (talk) 19:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

new section

I would expect a service / hospitality / tourism section in this article, as that is a major component of the economy. Turidoth (talk) 05:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that tourism and hospitality are less important to the Icelandic economy than say information technology. I'm not sure we need information about tourism on this page. OliAtlason (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of Nordic Tiger

I propose that Nordic Tiger be merged to this article. There's not much need for a separate article on a short-lived nickname. Fg2 (talk) 07:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changing intro

The intro sounds terrible in the present circumstances: "well-developed", "highest levels of economic freedoms". These kinds of astonishing texts should be changed.Daanschr (talk) 13:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

gdp and government revenues

The infobox has 12b GDP and nearly 10b in government revenues. Is this correct, as it would suggest an average tax rate of about 80%? --86.162.175.76 (talk) 00:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Either of the number is probably incorrectly dated. The CIA factbook currently says 11.9 billion USD in GDP and 4.8 billion USD in government revenue. --Bjarki (talk) 01:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the last data of economic growth?

All other articles about the economy of other countries has its last economic growth data(i.e. economy of south korea, economy of germany, etc...)

Why isn't the latest data about the growth of iceland on this article? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.15.167.180 (talk) 23:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Economy of Iceland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Economy of Iceland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150206025936/http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings to http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Economy of Iceland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contextual External Links

Never seen a page with that many, and nearly all going to one site. I'll do what I can to clean it up. --FeldBum (talk) 20:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism

What kind of packaging do you use when exporting tourism? 46.7.188.106 (talk) 14:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect % GDP tourism

Tourism accounted for more than 33% of the country's GDP in 2019.[19] This is incorrect. Nowhere is the reference is this mentioned. The correct figure is more around 10%.