Talk:Economy of Montenegro

Montenegro Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestions for improving the article

This is an important topic as there exists very little information on the economy of CG readily available elsewhere on the net (or other public sources for that matter).

Unfortunately, this is still a pretty bad article. I would suggest starting out with the basics on the economy today. eg stating the GDP, GDP per capita, currency arrangement, inflation level, growth rates, etc. Would go on to discuss the makeup of the economy (including role of aluminium works and tourism in the economy), intl. trade agreements, taxes, status of privatization and economic reforms and liberalization. Might also want to add something about the ongoing problems with smuggling and money laundering. Only then do I think it is warranted to go into the economic history of CG.Osli73 10:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not an easy article to create

I am aware of all the insufficiencies of this article, but it was a start. I live in Podgorica all my life, and you can't imagine how difficult it is to find reliable GDP data, unemployment rates, and other economic indicators, as all those are usually found for Serbia and Montenegro together. I managed to find data for 2005 from 5-6 souces, but they all vary drastically! Then I decided to put at least an overview and history, and I did so by merging the revised www.montenet.org economy article with some of my own text. Any help and improvment welcome!Nije bitno... 19:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found this working paper [1] from CEPS (Centre for European Policy Studies) on the economy of CG. It seems quite extensive and should be useful. Only problem is it's rather old (2000). However, I remember CEPS as a very serious and authoritative source from my studies in European politics. Good luck!Osli73 20:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I could also easily find data up to 2002, but in a region as dynamic as Balkans - it is not of much use. I would only post reliable data from 2005.Nije bitno... 13:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With Montenegro now independent, there will be a Ministry of Finance in CG or somesuch that will publish CG-specific data, so they can be a source. -Fsotrain09 22:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Currency in the past

100 Para = 1 Perper Böri (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Economy of Montenegro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070104140925/http://www.njegoskij.org/menu_today/menu_countryProfile.php to http://www.njegoskij.org/menu_today/menu_countryProfile.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]