Talk:Ectogenesis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ectogenesis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Ectogenesis is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems with this Article[edit]

There are numerous problems with this article, but I have neither the time to fix them nor sufficient knowledge to do so in the first place. I have added a couple of cleanup tags. This mostly refers to the "Ethics" section, not the others which are well referenced.

Bias--This article involves heavy doses of opinion and bias. While I personally agree with most of the biased statements in this article, it is nonetheless biased and needs to be cleaned up. A prime example is the statement that the courts would remove a fetus from its mother because she wore her seatbelt incorrectly. Perhaps a better statement would be that such a situation would make it possible for a court to make such a ruling, rather than insisting that the court certainly would.

World Audience--I assume from the statement "our courts", combined with my own opinion of the American Judicial System, that the author of this statement is an American and refers to these same courts. It is, however, inappropriate because Wikipedia has an international audience and this statement refers specifically to one court (or at least it would appear that way). Better wording and above all else, citations are needed.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jonkun227 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Copyright violations in this article[edit]

The following sections were found to be clear Copyright violations and had to be deleted. If someone would like to re-write the article USING this information in their OWN-WORDS the links are available.

This section: Implications for Roe vs. Wade is from SF Gate Sunday, August 24, 2003.

Key Developments, A Panacea for Reproductive Issues, Ethical Issues, and The End of Elective Abortion? are from Ectogenesis - Panacea or Ethical Nightmare? Wed Oct 01, 2003--DO11.10 18:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]