Jump to content

Talk:Edgar Fernández/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Golden (talk · contribs) 18:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. — Golden talk 18:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • from Santa Cruz - It is not clear from the sentence whether he is originally from Santa Cruz or if he resided there while serving as a party-list member.
  • Santa Cruz is linked for the second time in the second paragraph.
  • Throughout the article, you have used the names of departments instead of specific locations. I suggest using specific place names. For example, is it not known where in the Cochabamba Department he was born?
  • settled in the capital city - This could easily be misunderstood as the capital of Bolivia, which is not the case. I suggest rephrasing it to something like this: "..settled in Santa Cruz de la Sierra, the capital of Santa Cruz, where he.."
  • settled in the capital city's Plan 3,000 district - The inclusion of the district is unnecessary here since you don't mention anything else about it in the lead.
  • align his sector - Is this referring to the taxi sector? It would be helpful to clarify that here.
  • bore fruit in the form of -> resulted in
  • It would be useful to include information about how and when he became a member of the Movement for Socialism.

Early life and career[edit]

  • "himself" is unnecessary here.
  • Simultaneously to that - "to that" is unnecessary.
  • Santa Cruz's Plan 3,000 -> "Santa Cruz's Plan 3,000 district"

Chamber of Deputies[edit]

  • in the department. -> "in Santa Cruz department."
  • only solidified - "only" is unnecessary.

References[edit]

  • Spot-checked references #1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 16.
  • I used Google Translate to confirm the sources.
  • No issues were found during spot-checking. All references that were checked support the statements for which they are cited.

External links[edit]

  • This page has already been linked in the references. Is it necessary to include it as a separate external link?

General comments[edit]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.