Talk:Edible lichen

Fungi: Lichens Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Lichen task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

not mosses[edit]

none of these examples are mosses. all three are lichens.

Yes, you're right. That's why I started a new article. Lichen in the title should be capitalized, but I don't know how to do it.--NinetyNineFennelSeeds (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On stating that Edible Lichens are lichens that are edible[edit]

It is definitely a constructive addition. Aside from it being a true fact, it also does two things. Namely:

One, it clears up what exactly the article is about, i.e. lichen that is edible (as opposed to something else which might go by that same name).
Two, it prevents the article from being nothing more than a list of edible lichens, which it currently is. (right now it would be more appropriate to make a list called "list_of_edible_lichen" or something)

Therefore I find the addition of such a phrase to be completely appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WvittiM (talk • contribs) 17:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your arguments. Firstly, your addition does not clear up anything, as there were never any ambiguity regarding "Edible Lichen" as it is completely self explainatory. And regarding your second argument, it does not contribute to the article being more than a list of edible lichens. Brakebusk (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there is, to my knowledge, no lichen called "Edible lichen" that is not also edible, I think the citation requirement is oodles of silly. Gave me a good laugh, at least. What next? Are we going to need citations to claim that words are words? Xander T. (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)^{[citation needed]}[reply]

Lichens eaten by non-humans[edit]

Lichens are important, or the main diet of animals such as reindeer, snails and the black-and-white snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti). I propose adding a short section about these lichens, rather than just having links in a list. MerielGJones (talk) 21:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]