Talk:Edward Bishop (mayor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suggest split[edit]

@Nikkimaria: can you please elaborate on your edit summary "hide - too much detail for article about individual not the family, suggest splitting off"? What would you call such a split off article, and how would it meet notability criteria? Schwede66 18:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about one particular individual - Edward Bishop - not his entire family. While it is reasonable to mention siblings, and perhaps even their marriages, the amount of detail that was present here seems to me to be undue. You have a few options to address this:
  1. Create an article about "The Pilgrims" mentioned here, a potentially notable group
  2. Create an article about the Bishop family more generally, although you might have trouble deciding where that family stops and another, like the Alports, begins
  3. Create articles about individual notable family members - Charles at least would be notable, quite likely others mentioned would be as well
  4. If you feel none of those options are viable (because of notability or other considerations), then simply remove the content entirely. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Pilgrims is certainly a topic that meets notability. There are about 800 people that belong to that group. Whilst that would make a good article and we should have it, wouldn't we have the same problem with the amount of detail to be undue, considering that it's such a large group of people, and dozens of them having articles already (thus them being notable)? Schwede66 22:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if dozens of them have articles already, perhaps we should go with option 3 and add a few more? Nikkimaria (talk) 01:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Edward Bishop (mayor). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edward Bishop (mayor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]