This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
I object to this PROD on a procedural basis that it has been placed by an IP address with no previous edits. JP (Talk) 09:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jpeeling: There is no reason why an IP cannot nominate for PROD. 81.141.87.235 (talk) 10:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is the rule prohibiting it equally a PROD can be removed for any reason. My personal view is that IP whose first edit is placing a PROD is likely to be an experienced Wikipedia editor hiding behind a IP address in which case they should be using their original account, Wikipedia has too many issues with sockpuppets. JP (Talk) 11:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jpeeling: Please show me the rule that says an IP cannot propose a PROD. 81.141.87.235 (talk) 11:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It should read "There is no rule prohibiting it" JP (Talk) 11:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jpeeling: So your objection is that I am an IP editor who chooses not to register. I am not engaging in any sockpuppet behaviour. If I were to be doing this, I would come along with a registered account and support the deletion. You are assuming bad faith here. It would also be nice if you could apologise for your typo above, which completely changed the meaning of what you wrote... 81.141.87.235 (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
