Talk:Einstein–Szilard letter

Question

why no one translates the entire letter here? I mean, it's an article about a letter, yet we don't have the full content in english... dafuk

The whole letter is there to read in the image. WP:NOFULLTEXT: Longer texts are best summarised with the full text placed on Wikisource, or given as an external link. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

"At the time there was disagreement about whether it was uranium-235, which made up less than 1% of natural uranium, or the more abundant uranium-238 isotope, as Fermi maintained, that was primarily responsible for fission. Fermi and Szilárd conducted a series of experiments, and concluded that a chain reaction in natural uranium could be possible if they could find a suitable neutron moderator." To me, it sounds like they conducted experiments to confirm the isotope which is responsible for fission. Maybe just change the sentence a bit. ~~Some dumb guy~~

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Einstein–Szilárd letter. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://virtor.bar.admin.ch/pdf/ausstellung_einstein_fr/der_pazifist/A-Bomb_Regrets.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Passive voice.

Given that this is a good article about a passive subject (a letter), I believe the passive voice should be retained. I restored the stable version but was reverted without discussion.

Here is the original version:

The Einstein–Szilárd letter was a letter written by Leó Szilárd and signed by Albert Einstein that was sent to the United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 2, 1939. Written by Szilárd in consultation with fellow Hungarian physicists Edward Teller and Eugene Wigner, the letter warned that Germany might develop atomic bombs and suggested that the United States should start its own nuclear program. It prompted action by Roosevelt, which eventually resulted in the Manhattan Project developing the first atomic bombs.

Here is the edit that I reverted:

The Einstein–Szilárd letter was a letter that Leó Szilárd wrote and Albert Einstein signed, which they sent to President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 2, 1939. Szilárd wrote it in consultation with fellow Hungarian physicists Edward Teller and Eugene Wigner, warning that Germany might develop atomic bombs and suggesting that the United States should start its own nuclear program. It prompted action by Roosevelt which resulted in the Manhattan Project developing the first atomic bombs.

I believe the former version far more appropriate. As per BRD I expect this to be discussed. For the moment, it should be retained.NEDOCHAN (talk) 15:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Einstein’s role

Isaacson, mentioning among other things Szilard’s own recollections, is very clear that Einstein dictated the letter, which then later Szilard translated. He also writes that Einstein’s role was minimized later, including by himself. I believe this contrasts with parts of this article, and should merit some discussion.

I direct you to the pages 471–, and especially footnote 7 of that chapter. Walter Isaacson (2017), ISBN: 978-1-4711-7938-9. Euor (talk) 16:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Another question

Why isn't the letter The Szillard-Teller-Wigner Letter? They wrote it. Einstein's name does not belong in the title. This is Pure Propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.180.5.76 (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

WP:COMMONNAME: Article titles are based on how reliable English-language sources refer to the article's subject. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)