Talk:Eixample

Catalan-speaking countries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catalan-speaking countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history, languages, and cultures of Catalan-speaking countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Catalan-speaking countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesTemplate:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesCatalan-speaking countries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photo very old

Please, change the foto Barcelona-Montjuic... is very very old... the photo has a 20-25 years... please, change it, thanx—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.32.224.173 (talk • contribs)

Which photo? Image:Sagrada Familia Eixample from Montjuic.jpg says it is recent. Is this incorrect? -SCEhard T 02:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again (i guess the same anonymous user had doubts about the same picture linked from the Sagrada Familia article): i took this photo myself in June 2006. Please, anonymous user, stop this nonsense. What on earth tells you it is 20 years old?

25 years ago the section between the two main facades was virtually inexistent!! (see http://www.gaudiallgaudi.com/AA012crono.htm)

You're also welcome to check the EXIF info of the photo so we can close this sterile debate.--Jullag 11:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the anonymous boy. The sagrada family's photo is very older ( i'm from Barcelona )And this is not the Barcelona eixample. In this moments there are Agbar tower, works in Glories with new towers ( hotels, companies etc ) This is my opinionon, if you would you can still leave the older photo, but you can see this photo and you can see the diferences ok? thanks and sorry by my poor english ;) The Eixample's photo ( more clear )http://www.ub.es/dppss/psicamb/eixample.jpg ---> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.27.17.46 (talk) 19:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

more on the original design and what parts of it were not built?

Hi, this is a good article but I'd love to read more about the original plan for Eixample, and especially the story behind which parts were not built. I love the area but I always feel that it could have been so much more. The impossible-to-avoid traffic, the lack of parks etc. I love the original plan of 2 or 3 sided buildings - what happened that the plan wasn't followed? Brian Fenton (talk) 17:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The education section

The bit about the japanese library makes no sense here, it's hardly noteworthy and it cannot possibly be the only educational institution of note in that neighborhood, can it?