Talk:Electrically assisted turbocharger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"" The electrical motors run at speeds in excess of 120,000 rpm and when used as generators, generate electricity at 98.5% electrical efficiency."" includes turbine ? some refs would be nice Wdl1961 (talk) 14:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Added Turbo Electric Ltd technology which is similar but targeted at gas-turbine engines. Also removed the "one source" tag since this is now from at least 2 sources. Grahamatwp (talk) 23:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Starting 2014, Formula 1 uses Hybrid turbochargers in their new V6 engines. However, this is not noted yet in the article. 77.174.68.249 (talk) 09:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not about hybrid turbochargers[edit]

No longer a wikimember, so no four tildes here, but be aware that "hybrid turbocharger" has absolutely nothing to do with electric motors spinning up turbos. A hybrid turbo is, and has been for at least 25 years, a modified turbocharger that utilises parts from various models of turbo to take the best characteristics. Think of it as a chimaera of a turbo. Spinning turbos with an electric motor is what is known as an "electric turbocharger", even when combined with an exhaust gas impeller. So, this article is all wrong. I would rewrite but I no longer have a wiki account and refuse to sign up for a new one since wikipedia got all "sign your comment with four tildes" 10 years ago or so. I only care that the article is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.24.21 (talk) 00:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

William A. Kelley (talk) 17:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC) I came to look up what a hybrid turbocharger is, having seen many and was looking for a definition. The hybrid turbochargers for sale out there are mechanically coupled precisely like "no longer a wiki member" says, and have no electrical connections at all. So at best this is the wrong name, at worst this beast isnt out there.William A. Kelley (talk) 17:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC) William A. Kelley (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)http://www.aeristech.co.uk/ calls this a "full electric turbocharger", not a hybrid.William A. Kelley (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is COMPLETELY factually incorrect[edit]

This should be removed completely.

Here is a link to a a good page accurately describing hybrid turbochargers: http://www.hybridturbos.com/what-is-a-hybrid-turbo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.254.75.195 (talk) 07:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be renamed[edit]

It should be renamed to something like Hybrid/Split-Electric turbocharger. While I can see why a layman would think this type of split electric turbo-charger could be called a hybrid, due to the use of the term with electric-petrol hybrid engines, it is not correctly used here; Anyone in the industry can verify this.

The term "Hybrid turbocharger" has a prior meaning to indicate an aftermarket turbocharger that is a mix of different types (e.g. mismatching impeller or different non-OE sized intake/output diameters). This link suggests the term was in use in 1985, pre-dating any electric hybrid idea by decades! https://www.turbotechnics.com/turbochargers/hybrid-performance/what-is-a-hybrid-turbo/

I'd do it myself but I don't know how to rename a whole page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.219.82 (talk) 22:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]