Talk:Electrohomeopathy

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

contents have been released under GFDL - see WP:OTRS Ticket#2008082610000654. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:37, 28 August 2008 (UTC) {{OTRS permission|id=2008082610000654}}[reply]

I have nullified the template because the ticket cannot be found. I failed to find it searching by the ticket, and it could not be found searching by the article title (although several later tickets referencing the article were found). I asked an OTRS administrator, who also could not locate the ticket. Because of this, we are unable to verify the release. However, the content has been overwritten subsequently, so should not represent a concern. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

The tone of this article fails to meet WP:NPOV expectations. Movingboxes (talk) 12:48, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gone some way towards fixing that, I hope. Tag removed. Brammarb (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

The user who uploaded and added the image on this page has also added the following "Photograph of Count Mattei: Courtesy: Archivio Museo Cesare Mattei O.N.L.U.S.Via Nazionale 117, Riola (Bologna), ITALY" which makes me worry about the public domain notice on the image and the claim that the editor made the image themselves (took the photo?). The painting does indeed belong to the museum above, but as to its copyright status, I'm unsure. Verbal chat 16:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of DRKUNDU's Edits

The edits you have added to the article are profoundly in appearance as Original Research and somewhat self promotion of your own book. The article is barely holding on as an article ..the changes you are making will ensure it gets speedily deleted again as it has done 5 times in the past..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjicharlton (talk • contribs) 04:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an argument for leaving in the books that are not written by Dr Kundu? I haven't had the time to check out the modern books on the subject, although they do exist. It would be helpful to have some sort of input from someone who is versed in the practice of the discipline, so long as they behave themselves while making the input...Brammarb (talk) 08:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They need justification for inclusion. There is a policy or guideline somewhere about reading lists. Verbal chat 08:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References to pseudoscience and quackery

While it is almost certainly true that electro-homeopathy is both pseudoscience and quackery, none of the four references newly cited in the article make that case (that is to say, deal with electro-homeopathy qua charlatanism) but rather they are denunciations of pseudoscience and quackery as a Bad Thing. While I say "hear, hear" to that, I'd be tempted to delete those references as not relevant to the specific topic under discussion and instead simply rely on the BMJ references (which do make the specific charge of mountebank-ery, if that's a word) already in the text and to link to pseudoscience and quackery. Any thoughts? Brammarb (talk) 14:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mountebank is an old synonym for quack. -- Fyslee / talk 17:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further reading section

Any future additions to the further reading section should be justified with an explanatory note here. Many thanks. Verbal chat

The editor who reverted back commented that theres no reason to believe that these are reliable sources, the concerned editor must check the authors/editors involved in those publications, he must either update himself or retire, if he is interested to go through these books and papers, please needed just one email to info.drsnutraceuticals@gmail.com with Street Address, since the books are hard copies.

Kundu, Debasish https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Debasish-Kundu-3, https://independent.academia.edu/DebasishKundu

Agnihotri, Vijai Kant https://acsir.res.in/facultylist/

Pezzani, Raffaele https://unipd.academia.edu/RaffaelePezzani

Hayouni, El Akrem https://www.pasrc.org/members/individuals/el-akrem-hayouni

Morrell, Peter http://www.homeoint.org/morrell/index.htm

This is Pubmed Indexed: DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368340 Alchemy from Mystery to Medicine ,Homœopathic Links — Preceding unsigned comment added by Info.drsnutraceuticals (talk • contribs) 07:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spamming references by Kundu, Debasish into the article. And please only one account. Meters (talk) 08:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted)

Could you please justify the deletion of these books :

1)Pathways of Homoeopathic Medicine by Bettina Blessing , Springer ( ISBN 3642438733)

2)Spagyrische Arzneimittel Pharmazie und Alchemie der Neuzeit Paperback – by Axel Helmstadter,Wissenschaftliche Verlagsges (ISBN 3804711138)

About Kundu his books are recommended texts in Faculty of Ayush, Deptt. of Homeopathy of Sarvapally Radhakrishnan University, vide M.P. Govt. Gazette Notification No.R-450-CC-2015-XXXVIII Dated- 23/07/2015 (online link: http://govtpressmp.nic.in/pdf/part-4/2015-07-24-30.pdf ) , and also by Maharashtra State Board of Vocational Education Examination, Mumbai, vide Order Dated 02/12/2015(online link: www.msbve.gov.in/msbve/pdf/201234.pdf ), thats the reason for listing by me, not my relative or so, thanks for bogus remarks, or just whitewashing on truth that Wikipedia is a platform for burying Alternative medicine. Ravi J Raj, Kaliyakka Villai, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu, India, 9445684374 Info.drsnutraceuticals (talk) 14:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ONUS. From the titles, those books are clearly pro-quackery and thus WP:PROFRINGE. --Hob Gadling (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Electrohomeopathy must corrected as Spagyric System of Medicine

Italian Spagyrist Dr. Count Cesare Mattei had invented Electrohomoeopathy on the basis of Paracelsian ( Iatrochemist) Spagyrical philosophy. Mattei's Spagyric medicines are prepared by medicinal plants extraction method, called as Cohobation method i. e. repeated distillation process. Basic principle of Mattei's Electrohomeopathy is diseases occurred due to vitiation of blood and lymph and treatment lies in their correctness or purification. Fundamental laws of EH system is complexia complexis curentur & law of polarity .Mattei's Spagyric medicines proved their pharmacological action only on sick person. 114 EH medicinal plants are already has been already approved in German pharmacopoeia, GHP, USHP, BHP. There are total 60 types of Spagyric drugs are mentioned in Electrohomeopathy / Spagyric medicine system. - Dr. Santosh Devidasrao Jamdade, City - Latur, Maharashtra State, India ( Proposal promoter for EH recognition in India to IDC, DHR, Ministry of health and family welfare, New Delhi, Govt. Of India ) Editor of Spagyric Pharmacopoeia of India - Year 2018 ( proposed & unofficial ) Dr Santosh Jamdade (talk) 03:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Electrohomeopathy in pharmacy why important

Please suggestions and help me🥺 2409:4060:2E10:765B:0:0:384B:250F (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not important, it's just a sham. And this page is for improving the article and not for anything else. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]