Talk:Electronic navigational chart

Raster charts[edit]

Surely raster charts are not databases? Billlion (talk) 10:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyrights[edit]

What is the copyright status of the ENC data? Are they released to public domain by the governments, or are they restricted by... whom? Thanks! --grin ✎ 07:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Electronic navigational chart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110412104149/http://www.agc.army.mil:80/echarts/inlandnav/ to http://www.agc.army.mil/echarts/inlandnav/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Electronic navigational chart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

Good evening! I've tried to insert the link to a provider and developer of electronic navigational charts, who has a full electronic world chart folio, which may be useful, I believe, for those, who read the article. But the link was removed. I think, it is worthy to restore the link. Thank you! Yana Mazul (talk) 15:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

seperating ECDIS and ENC pages[edit]

I aim to fill this page out with more detail on what ENCs are including display/scale differences, raster vs vector, s-57 vs s-101 and all of the most up-to-date information I can.

I believe ECDIS is significant enough that it should not be a footnote to ENCs, so in a latter stage I would like to seperate it to a different topic. Input and ideas welcome Sharkhouse (talk) 21:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]