Talk:Elizabeth Webber

Under character reception it should be noted (by someone) that massive fan campaigns have prevented Rebecca from being fired/elizabeth being written off the show... at least twice I think. It's very rare for a fan campaign to be successful like this, elizabeth fans are a powerful bloc. I'm on my phone and dont have sourse handy but this is an extremely notable piece which is missing from this article. I suggest anybody wanting to edit this article start there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amyanda2000 (talk • contribs) 11:50, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Elizabeth's baby

Please do not post rumors about the name or gender of Elizabeth's baby, unless you can link to a published source which verifies this information. See Wikipedia:Verifiability. Thanks, El on ka 01:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I can appreciate the fan enthusiasm for the new baby in the show, but I just don't believe that there's enough out-of-universe information to really warrant a separate article at this time. I recommend that the pertinent information at Jacob Martin Spencer be merged to Elizabeth Webber Spencer, and that Baby Jake's name(s) be set up as redirects to Elizabeth's page. When the character is older and actually has an independent storyline and notability, a separate article can easily be re-established. --El on ka 20:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About merge

I think that we should just leave it as it is instead of keep merging everything together. Jacob does have a storyline about the kidnapping. Whoever put that Sam took Jake, please remove it because no one knows for sure that she took him. It's just a rumor.

Too much

Seems to me, I could be wrong, but the article seems to have become TOO MUCH like a Lucky/Liz article and less about Liz in general. DJ-Siren 20:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Merge

I do not think the pages should be merged.

If you don't think the article about warranted, don't visit it. If you prefer to read Elizabeth's page, do that. But why delete the article or merge it with another after it was already posted. It is just unnecessary.

~Jesmac13

Please don't merge

I don't know how the final decision is made, but I vote no merge. I think they should remain separate articles. I actually found the page as a link from Alan Q's page, something I never fould have found if it were buried on Liz's page. (Teri 04:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Don't Merge

I don't believe that these pages should be merged either. JM does have an s/l, furthermore other "soap children" without major storylines have their own page. - Cake0610

In-universe

I tagged this article as {{ununiverse}} because it reads like a biography rather than an article about the subject matter. Please see WP:WAF. --Tony Sidaway 15:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Writing a BOOK

Please refrain from writing a novel about your favorite pair. The basic facts are all that is necessary. Obviously, characters with whom Elizabeth shares a longer history will demand lengthier sections. Please keep in mind that this page should focus on Elizabeth first and foremost and that opinions should be left out as well as "flowery" language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Correctone (talk • contribs) 04:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surrogacy & Children Details

Elizabeth's surrogacy for Jax & Courtney is mentioned in the article. However, the child she miscarried was NOT HERS and should not be listed in the "Children" section of the relationships box. The child belonged to Jax and Courtney and was absolutely no relation to her. -Correctone —Preceding unsigned comment added by Correctone (talk • contribs) 21:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Details like "Lucky is raising him" are really not necessary to include in the relationships box. The article clearly states that Lucky is still pretending to be the father of Elizabeth's children. ~Correctone

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Elizabeth Webber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Elizabeth Webber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2011/04/14/general-hospitals-ingo-rademacher-where-are-my-scenes-with-elizabeth
Corrected formatting/usage for http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2011/01/19/regan-reax-my-love-affair-with-rebecca-herbst-and-elizabeth-webber
Corrected formatting/usage for http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2012/12/10/daytime-confidentials-top-10-soap-opera-couples-of-2012?page=0,4
Added archive https://archive.is/20130412054425/http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2007/12/21/top-10-rivalries-of-2007 to http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2007/12/21/top-10-rivalries-of-2007
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071212145225/http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070324/ent/ent3.html to http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070324/ent/ent3.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://beta.abc.go.com/shows/general-hospital/bio/elizabeth-webber/165650
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070828064251/http://generalhospital.about.com/od/thecharacter1/p/ewebber.htm to http://generalhospital.about.com/od/thecharacter1/p/ewebber.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]