Talk:Elliptic curve primality

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Elliptic curve primality proving was copied or moved into Elliptic curve primality testing with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Merge[edit]

This page should be merged with the page the same topic at Elliptic curve primality proving. This one is more detailed. I won't find time for this. TLange (talk) 19:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative link[edit]

The link for Morain, Francois, Implementation of the Atkin–Goldwasser–Kilian Primality Testing Algorithm, https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/44864/1/44864.pdf is broken. I've found another version at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.38.6932 but I'm unsure how to proceed / how "stable" the citeseer URL would be. jmbreuer (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Larger prime found[edit]

Apparently 10^50,000 + 65,859 is prime, as verified by this method. Announcement here, but an independent source would be better. --mfb (talk) 10:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]