Jump to content

Talk:Elmer Gedeon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleElmer Gedeon has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 12, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 26, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
January 10, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 3, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Washington Senators outfielder Elmer Gedeon, who pulled a crew member from a burning wreck, died while piloting a B-26 bomber over France?
Current status: Good article
[edit]

The 'Harry O'Neill' link goes not to the MLB player, but to a 'One Life To Live' character page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.52.141 (talk) 16:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Inaccuracies

[edit]

This article says that Elmer's uncle Joe was implicated in the Black Sox scandel. The Joe Gedeon article doesn't say anything about playing for the White Sox, reads that Elmer was his son, and reads that Elmer was one of four Major League Baseball players killed in combat. This article says two were killed in combat. Clearly these inaccuracies need to be worked out. --Daysleeper47 17:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Auto Peer Review

[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 15:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

Hi, nice article, not bad at all but needs a little bit of work before it is ready.

This article should probably have been nominated for the sports section, as that is what he is notable for, and I am not sure if this article satisfys the sports bio requirements. I will have to reassess it once the above information is dealt with and will then let you know the final desicion. For now the article is on hold.--Jackyd101 (talk) 04:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Great, the article is much easier on the eye. I will now conduct a second review, note any further changes needed and extend the hold period another seven days. Apologies for this two-stage review but I was a little unfamiliar with the sporting format and wanted to the see the article more cohesive before giving it a more thorough GA review.

  • "ultimate service" in the intro is a slightly odd usage. It might be better phrased as "final mission" or "death in action" etc etc. In fact, that entire sentance should probably come after the sentance on his baseball career and it should be mentioned he served with the USAAF before commenting that he had flown several missions e.g.Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 22:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elmer John Gedeon (April 15, 1917 - April 20, 1944) is best remembered as one of only two Major League Baseball players killed in action during World War II. He was a professional baseball player who had been a multisport star in college at the University of Michigan. He had also flown several missions in the European Theater of Operations as an officer of the United States Army Air Force before his final, fatal mission.

  • Rest of the lead is fine.
  • I really like the dual infoboxes, they provide all relevant information between each other without overlapping or conflicting with one another.
  • Any info on parentage? Not essential, but would certainly be interesting.
  • Can you explain what "Gedeon, who wore #51 for the Michigan Wolverines football program from 1991 to 1994" means either here or in the article if necessary? As I mentioned I know nothing about baseball, so this maybe obvious to people who follow it, but I don't understand it at all.
    • On many sports-related infoboxes Jersey numbers are included. People care about who wore what Jersey. Thus, for the reader a jersey number is an encyclopedic fact. Here we are saying what jersey number he wore for Michigan football. I do have the wrong years though.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 22:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good work on linking the Hornets, never mind about the Orlando team, its not vital.

Thats it. A very nice and solid article and these fixes are minor and shouldn't take long. I will be happy to pass this for GA when they are addressed. Well done to all concerned. When it is passed, what do the contributors think about placement - military or sports?--Jackyd101 (talk) 02:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In life he is notable as a baseball player. I.E., he would be eligible for a WP article as a former professional baseball player. The page would withstand any WP:AFD challenge. His military service during his life would not. In death, he is notable as a military officer who died as a former major league baseball player. I think if I were to look at a priority scale for which I have added tags and say which should have the highest priority rating it would be MILHIST. He is an important footnote for each of the projects, but he is most important for his contribution to military history. Thus, I think he should be included in the military section.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 22:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, the jersey thing makes more sense now you've explained it. I'll also go with your opinion on military history as the place for this to go (and I was never worried about Afd, this is clearly notable). The article is vastly improved since my first review and is now a very fine GA (I made a slight edit to the lead). Well done to all involved.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit

[edit]

I am just doing some minor copy edit. I hope folks don't mind. Nice work so far! Cheers, --Tom 17:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Elmer Gedeon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Elmer Gedeon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of Content Removal of February 2017

[edit]

As asked, I am explaining the reason behind my content removal from the section titles "Growing up in Cleveland."

I removed the last few sentences, which read "Gedeon's surname was common in Cleveland, because many people from Sudetenland, where it was common, settled in Cleveland.[6] The phonebook listed numerous Gedeons for biographical research. One finding was that Gedeon's widow, who was named Laura, later moved to Florida.[6] Another was that his third cousin Charlotte Gedeon said Elmer carried her grandmother's casket during a funeral.[6]" My reason for removing this was that I felt this info was at best tangentially related to Elmer Gedeon's life and career. A baseball fan researching Gedeon cares little about the commonality of his last name, or about his third cousin. Were these sentences better weaved in to the rest of the section, I may have felt differently, but the content was also poorly written and seemed to stick out like a sore thumb against the rest of the article. The sentence "The phonebook listed numerous Gedeons for biographical research" is very vague. It seems almost like a meta-commentary on the research used to compile this article, which I feel is not appropriate for such a page. I see little use for having these findings about Gedeons in Cleveland on Elmer Gedeon's Wikipedia page, and I would be interested to hear someone's counter argument for undoing my content removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5krunguy (talkcontribs) 16:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]