Talk:Elwood Haynes/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I have gone through it and copy edited it, rather than leave you a long list of small problems to fix. Please fee free to change any mistakes I have made. This is a wonderful articles, thoroughly interesting and enjoyable. The only barrier to its passing GA is a {{citation needed}} tag. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 20:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed. I have been to the library and got a great book on Haynes. I hope to have the article up to FA in a week or so! Thanks! Charles Edward (Talk) 21:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Final GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Quite well written
b (MoS): Follows MoS
- a (prose): Quite well written
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): Well referenced
b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable
c (OR): No OR
- a (references): Well referenced
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Covers major aspects
b (focused): Remains focused on topic
- a (major aspects): Covers major aspects
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Congratulations!