Talk:Em (restaurant)

Em (restaurant) has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 21, 2024	Good article nominee	Listed

Food and drink: Foodservice Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

Advert[edit]

@Skywatcher68: since you are siding with an user that keeps disrupting the page, can you point out where the advertised content is located? (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At first glance, the Description and History sections appeared to be overly promotional but, after comparing with some other articles about highly-rated restaurants, I'm not so sure. –Skywatcher68 (talk) Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that's the only commentary found discussing the restaurant's history and description as of today. I write articles with the content that exists in a neutral manner, regardless if positive, neutral or negative, for example Pujol (restaurant)#Criticism. The history and description describe the restaurant in a neutral way. It is just about the dining and how the restaurant surged.

The IP that keeps disrupting the article, however, doesn't seem to understand the difference between WP:NOTPROMO and Wikipedia:Funding Wikipedia through advertisements. The article meets WP:NCORP (specifically WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS) and NOTPROMO: "Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery." Funding Wikipedia, the essay this person keeps using as a excuse to disrupt after multiple blocks, is about why Wikipedia doesn't add advert banners. It is also the same person that performed this edit to the Joe Biden 1988 presidential campaign, which is ironically questionable and reduces that editor's credibility.

Finally, Good article icons are not removed, even if the articles don't meet the good article criteria. There is a process (WP:GAR) that has to be fulfilled first.

If you or anyone (but I doubt that IP will do it) would like to start a GAR, AFD, or alike process (in the name of that IP person, which is what they seem to try to do when they say "This problem needs to be addressed in a serious administrative level", you can do it at the respective venues. Otherwise, the editor will continue disrupting until they get tired or the page results protected. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm primarily a Recent Changes Patroller and lost interest after investigating those other articles. :-) –Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:09, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]