Talk:Embassy of Uzbekistan, Washington, D.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeEmbassy of Uzbekistan, Washington, D.C. was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 15, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 11, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the original owner of the Embassy of Uzbekistan in Washington, D.C. building died during the sinking of the RMS Titanic?

Sources[edit]

Washington Life - architect

Moore died in Titanic

Historic American Building Survey

Opening date of Uzbekistan embassy

State Department

mentioned in Borat

AIA book

Embassy purpose - book

Drawings and design

Mass Ave historic district

(de Sebour built gaff house and the mellon building)

Jules Henri de Sibour[edit]

Does anyone know why Jules Henri de Sibour redirects to this particular building? I'd like to remove the redirect and start a separate article on J.H. de Sibour. Can anyone direct me to the process for removing a redirect? Thanks, Eli.pousson (talk) 18:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error[edit]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

The coordinates are the latitude and longitude are for a location in VA, not in Washington DC.


-Filll (talk | wpc) 23:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Deor (talk) 01:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Embassy of Uzbekistan, Washington, D.C./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 01:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    --See notes below
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    -- See notes below
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    --See notes below
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    While this article does convey a good amount of information, there are still several issues that need to be addressed before this article can be labeled "GA". Please see notes below. --Tea with toast (話) 02:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Issues needing to be address[edit]

I think the biggest problem that this article has is an identity crisis: This article could really just be given the title "Clarence Moore House" since all the information pertains to that and little attention is given to the fact that the building is an embassy, which I feel should be the real focus. Here are other items to be addressed:

  • More information is needed in the lead. The name of the ambassador should be given as should more information about the embassy. The first paragraph is only 1 sentence long, which is not ideal.
Done. 72.184.164.159 (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • A list of the consulates should be given.
The one consulate is now mentioned. 72.184.164.159 (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pop culture sections should generally be avoided in Wikipedia articles, and the one here should be deleted.
With much chagrin, I deleted it, although should I mention somewhere else in the article. Maybe a trivia section? 72.184.164.159 (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are 3 dead links. Please find new sources.

I thank the editors who have contributed to this article as it is in a much better state than most other Washington D.C. Embassy articles on Wikipedia. I hope this article will continue to progress. Happy editing~ --Tea with toast (話) 02:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I should also mention that you are free to renominate the article once improvements have been made. --Tea with toast (話) 02:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Embassy of Uzbekistan, Washington, D.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Embassy of Uzbekistan, Washington, D.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Embassy of Uzbekistan, Washington, D.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]