Talk:Embassy of the United Kingdom, Berlin

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

For the facade gives it as for all standing surrounding buildings very rigourous definitions, in addition among other things the eavesheight of 22 meters and also the high proportion of closed areas. In addition, the turqoise green roof is enjoined that Michael Wilford converted here as potemkinsche (fakery) construction with roof pitch; the building possesses actually only one flat roof.

Für die Fassade selbst gibt es wie für alle umstehenden Gebäude sehr strenge Festlegungen, dazu zählt unter anderem die Traufhöhe von 22 Metern und auch der hohe Anteil an geschlossener Fläche. Aber auch das türkisgrüne Dach ist vorgeschrieben, dass Michael Wilford hier als potemkinsche Konstruktion mit Dachschräge umsetzte; das Haus besitzt eigentlich nur ein Flachdach.

Why don't you do this in your own namespace, or better yet offsite altogether? Also references in German aren't much use. Adam 15:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because while I'm off in real life for a few hours someone with a knowledge of German who constructively edits might like a stab at the remainder of the translation. --Mcginnly | Natter 15:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Real life"? Was ist das? Adam 16:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- References in German are fine ~~as long as they are supplemented by english ones.~~ see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Sources_in_languages_other_than_English. And check out St. Mary's Church, Lübeck (BTW there's some untranslated German in that one too.....) For this article, though, theres plenty of citable material on the web, so I'm going to put the german references back in the article because they are supplementary to the english language references.--Mcginnly | Natter 16:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed images

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Embassy of the United Kingdom, Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.britischebotschaft.de/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.britischebotschaft.de/Building/more.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929103004/http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/bauen/botschaften/pix/bsb007.jpg to http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/bauen/botschaften/pix/bsb007.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Embassy of the United Kingdom, Pyongyang which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 07:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]