Talk:Embedded Java

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Needs rewriting[edit]

This section needs to be updated, as Embedded Java covers much more than Java ME and Sun SPOT alone -- it also covers embedded use of Java on top of Java platforms such as JavaCard and Java SE.--— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cblucasius (talk • contribs) 18:06, 16 July 2011

Done 06:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Embedded Java. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121219080700/http://www2s.biglobe.ne.jp/~dat/java/project/jvm/index_en.html to http://www2s.biglobe.ne.jp/~dat/java/project/jvm/index_en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing many things[edit]

Like the german version of this article this is also a very bad article (to me one of the worst articles in Wikipedia). It is missing a chronology - e.g. ME is described but e.g. PersonalJava is missing and also some examples for hardware where it was used (e.g. Motorola Blackbird/Streamaster where prototypes had just 8 MB RAM). The meaning of "embedded" in Java context is not well described. Also programming aspects (e.g. String vs. StringBuffer vs. StringBuilder) are not explained to give a better picture what it actually means. Some related topics like Java processors with JVM in hardware are not mentioned. IMHO here are a lot of things to fix and add. (reichhart) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.216.165.252 (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]