Talk:Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Gas turbine#Gas turbines for electrical power production|Gas turbine]] The anchor (#Gas turbines for electrical power production) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

i want to know the step to take in desiging an independent energy town

Include link to Executive order (United States)[edit]

For example, in contrast with California's statutory Instruments, example ... http://gov.ca.gov/news.php?id=17008 99.190.83.89 (talk) 09:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That makes no sense, and probably wouldn't be a reason for inclusion if it did. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify from others, see Executive order (disambiguation). 99.181.143.108 (talk) 04:31, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That still makes no sense. Please learn to write in English before commenting again. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:44, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Way off topic. The external link itself probably doesn't belong. --Ronz (talk) 06:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly, see Zero-net-energy USA federal buildings and Fleet vehicle. 99.181.131.215 (talk) 00:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what is your point? --Ronz (talk) 02:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Protection but article needs major work[edit]

I've semi-protected the article for a week because of the edit warring by the dynamic IP...but I'd appreciate if someone would fix the massive external links problems in this article, since I'd rather stay uninvolved. First, there shouldn't be direct links in the text itself, and second, there probably shouldn't be any links other than the one to the main eGRID website. You can hash out the details, but this is very much inappropriate as it stands now. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]