A fact from Emma Hunter (telegrapher) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 August 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created on July 12, nom on July 14 - new enough; 2523 char - long enough; neutral; cited; no photo; QPQ done. Hook at 88 char is under the maximum; interesting, and neutral. Almost 50% of text is noted in Earwig as being close to the source Pennsylvania Heritage. Reviewing the findings, the article needs a copyedit as close paraphrasing is more than just titles and the one lengthy quote. If you are going to say she is "arguably" IMO, you need to specify who is making that argument. Please ping me when copyedit has rectified the noted issues. SusunW (talk) 18:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Z1720 for notifying Topshelver again. I don't think closing the article is a solution, as we all now know there is close paraphrasing. I'll work on it and try to eliminate that issue, but what I don't know is whether I can approve it still if I fix that problem. SusunW (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SusunW: If it is minor changes then I think you can still approve, but if you are doing some major rewrites or restructuring then this will probably need a new reviewer. When in doubt, get a new reviewer. Once this is ready, you can approve it or mark it with a red "DYK?again" arrow so that a new reviewer will look at it. Z1720 (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
_telegrapher_West_Chester_Pennsylvania.jpg)
Created on July 12, nom on July 14 - new enough; 2523 char - long enough; neutral; cited; no photo; QPQ done. Hook at 88 char is under the maximum; interesting, and neutral. Almost 50% of text is noted in Earwig as being close to the source Pennsylvania Heritage. Reviewing the findings, the article needs a copyedit as close paraphrasing is more than just titles and the one lengthy quote. If you are going to say she is "arguably" IMO, you need to specify who is making that argument. Please ping me when copyedit has rectified the noted issues. SusunW (talk) 18:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Needs a new reviewer, I think, based on above conversation. SusunW (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
--evrik (talk) 03:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)