This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please add the following line to the current last line of the article, currently ending "swam a 4:33:24".
On 3/22/2022 Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued a proclamation that Emma Weyant is "the rightful winner of the 2022 NCAA Division 1 Women's 500-yard Freestyle".[1][2]
actually User:Egsan Bacon reverted the change because s/he says DeSantis was "grandstanding" and it was not worth mentioning. Jkister (talk) 04:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the decision to not include the decree by Ron DeSantis should be reconsidered. It does not violate WP:UNDUE, WP:BLP nor WP:MINORASPECT (which are equivocal), and is significant enough to be included in her page, regardless of whether the decree is ineffectual in changing the result. Eritrusia (talk) 21:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As previously stated, I do not believe it is fair to Emma Weyant for a statement by an unrelated politician to play such an outsized role (WP:UNDUE) in her very small biography (7 total sentences!) unless and until she chooses to publicly acknowledge it in some way. (I have checked, but not been able to find anything.) The statement by DeSantis is an attempt to drag her into a national public controversy she's given no indication she wants to be in, and it would violate the spirit of WP:BLP to include it. As such, I am explicitly challenging its inclusion on BLP grounds. Despite the edit summary given when it was restored, that a politician said something about her once is most certainly not an "important fact" about Emma Weyant. Egsan Bacon (talk) 02:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It seems disproportionate for this article and should not be included per WP:MINORASPECT, An article should not give undue weight to minor aspects of its subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight proportional to its treatment in the body of reliable, published material on the subject. For example, a description of isolated events, quotes, criticisms, or news reports related to one subject may be verifiable and impartial, but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. This is a concern especially for recent events that may be in the news.Beccaynr (talk) 03:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Without mention of the surrounding controversy (which is probably primarily about Lia Thomas and not Emma Wayent), do we even need to mention a 2nd place finish in an NCAA championship on an Olympic swimmer's biography? Seems a bit mundane. IMO either both the race and DeSantis's comment should be mentioned or neither. Endwise (talk) 09:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the reference to Lia Thomas should be removed as an undue and disproportionate WP:COAT, so I will remove that as a start. Beccaynr (talk) 13:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to disagree that mentioning Thomas is UNDUE if the NCAAs are to be mentioned at all. The main reason Weyant received coverage about this event is because of the historical significance of Thomas. Kind of like you can't mention Peter Norman winning Olympic silver without mentioning Tommie Smith & John Carlos's salute. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Based on what was just added to the article [1] (and I reverted), it appears to be a WP:COATRACK to add Thomas. The historical significance of Thomas does not appear to be directly related to Weyant, beyond the burst of news related to DeSantis, who without any authority to do, proclaimed Weyant the winner - that news covered in the Thomas article, in the Public debate section, where it is directly related. I think we should be careful with attempts to add WP:COATs across multiple articles, especially to a short article like this, and where as noted above, Weyant does not appear to have involved herself in the debate. Beccaynr (talk) 21:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, in the Peter Norman article, there is sourced information about his direct involvement in the salute, so it does not seem like workable analogy for this situation. Beccaynr (talk) 21:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is probably the most neutral coverage of Weyant or pro-Virginia focus on Weyant,[2], noting that her finish was a career best, third best in Virginia program history, but still noting second to Lia Thomas and her place in history. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is a good find, and I have added it to the article, with the information about her career best. I am still tending to think that a mention of Lia Thomas by this source does not necessarily mean we should add a mention to this article, which is focused on Weyant. Beccaynr (talk) 22:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Without any authority to do" -- Like it or not, there is literally law on the books granting authority for this. "No Authority to do so" = "I think the law doesn't apply here"? or "I didn't know about this law" ?Jkister (talk) 22:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"DeSantis doesn't have the power to declare or disqualify winners in college sports, so Tuesday’s gubernatorial proclamation was largely symbolic." (WaPo, March 23, 2022). Beccaynr (talk) 22:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That article has no source for the author's claims. We need to question his credentials, too. Jkister (talk) 23:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:WAPO, Most editors consider The Washington Post generally reliable. Also, the 2021 law (NPR, 2021) is aimed at "barring transgender females from playing on public school teams" and per the NPR article, "the NCAA said it would commit championship games to "locations where hosts can commit to providing an environment that is safe, healthy and free of discrimination."" Beccaynr (talk) 00:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've been looking for some reaction from Weyant and so far all I can find is this, ( newsweek-"How Emma Weyant, Other Swimmers Reacted to Lia Thomas Win" which is an 'article' that's totally clutching at straws to find anything in her body language, and even this concludes she appeared to accept Thomas' victory, i.e. there's no 'controversy' to report in the scope of this article. JeffUK (talk) 14:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, per WP:NEWSWEEK, post-2013 Newsweek articles are not generally reliable.Beccaynr (talk) 14:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Based on this article that is not surprising, and that only reinforces my point that there is no RS for Weyant being an active part of any controversy JeffUK (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by Jkister * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)