Talk:English Disco Lovers

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the English Disco Lovers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about English Disco Lovers. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about English Disco Lovers at the Reference desk.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Notability

Since this example of internet culture has now had an article about it in the Guardian and a Facebook page with over 12,000 likes at the time of writing, I think it easily fulfills Wikipedia notability requirements.Star-one (talk) 10:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, "facebook page with 12,000 likes" is not relevant to notability (see WP:BIGNUMBER). The only thing relevant to notability is the availability and quality of sources. filelakeshoe (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The inclusion of this article on Wikipedia is preposterous. The justification given above for inclusion is meagre and laughable. Why this has not been marked for deletion I do not know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.162.93 (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It exists, it is sufficiently referenced as existing outside the self-referential world of Wikipedia; your opinion of how trivial it may or may not be is not relevant to the existence of it as an article on Wikipedia.Star-one (talk) 16:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A simple Google search query 'english disco lovers' provides many qualifying external sources verifying the existence of the movement.Star-one (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So they couldn't even keep a content-less Web site up for 10 years, and yet Wikipedia has an article about that site! 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:C5F1:624A:3BAD:EF44 (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]