Jump to content

Talk:Epicurious

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The website matter is fine, but I think the term you are looking for (in the second definition) is "bi-curious." Using "epicurious" is, I think, a malapropism. One usage by what appears to be a screenname does not define a word. I'm not sure what the citation is for that word but it is certainly not common usage. I am deleting the matter, but will gladly see it reinstated if someone can explain this to me.Polkapolkapoker 23:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epicurious. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Awards Section Needed

[edit]

I haven't yet learned how to modify Wikipedia (on my list), but the awards section ends in 2015. I got the impression from this that the website (Epicurious) had gone into disfavor after the updated design. However, a glance at the Webbys indicate that it won or was mentioned again several times in the years since [1].

Ordinarily I wouldn't care, but because I got the wrong impression, I thought it was important. Thanks. BobPango (talk) 18:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References