Talk:Epidemiology of binge drinking

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Epidemiology?[edit]

Since when is binge drinking classified as a disease? It seems rather obvious that it isn't. Even if we accept the designation, this article does not discuss causation in that specific sense. It's more like a poorly researched overview using simplistic data from health authorities, most of which is decades old.--Murky Falls (talk) 04:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Epidemiology of binge drinking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American Indians and First Nations[edit]

I think the only valuable part of this section is that which links to the Alcohol and Native Americans page, which contains a more nuanced overview of the topic. The opening line is unsourced and stereotypical. The rest states the results of one study and generalizes them to the entire population.

This is also the only section that applies to South America. Consider adding South American section Gabby~Gillis (talk) 17:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]