A fact from Episode 8052 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 April 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Episode 8052 of the Australian soap opera Neighbours concerns the death of series regular Sonya Rebecchi, whose portrayer's contract was not renewed to reduce production costs?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
Episode 8052 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 1 April 2019.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
" by series' producer", " series' regular" feels like an odd use of apostrophe here.
"Some viewers began campaigning on" -> "Some viewers campaigned on"
You relink "killed off" but not Neighbours, be consistent.
"filmed on location in" which "location"?
What about viewership figures in the UK?
Otherwise nothing much to add. It covers the subject well, is well referenced and correctly formatted. Trivial matters to attend to, so I'll put it on hold. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 10:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review The Rambling Man! I think the apostrophes were added during the copy edit, and I didn't spot them before nominating the article. I've made the other corrections, but couldn't find any ratings information for the UK broadcast. It appears that the episode didn't make Channel 5's top 15 programs for that week (at least according to BARB). - JuneGloom07Talk 23:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well that might be worth noting in any case, what was the viewership for the 15th most watched? The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 09:08, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
JuneGloom07 just pinging in case you didn't notice this. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 19:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I did miss this. The viewership total was 984,200 for Episode 8055 of Neighbours (that's without the online/smartphone viewers included). - JuneGloom07Talk 01:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, perhaps I confused matters. Even if we can't get the viewership figures for this episode on Channel 5, it's probably worth noting the negative, i.e. that it failed to reach the top 15 most-viewed shows on Channel 5 that week. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 17:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've added some UK ratings info to the article. The episode actually rated high with those streaming it on their computers/smartphones. - JuneGloom07Talk 21:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good work, happy that this easily surpasses the requirements at GAN, so promoting. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 07:58, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
