Talk:Epistle of Ignatius to the Trallians

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I cannot see why this should be the only of Ignatius' epistles to have its own article, particularly since it then extract just one verse from it. It almost seems that the original writer of the article was pushing his/her own line! A glance at [1] will show that he wrote many more. Thse are not mentioned in the Ignatius of Loyola article; nor is the Epistle to the Ephesians referred to in the more usual one by St Paul. Careless! Peter Shearan 12:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, are you proposing something? Well, I started the article because I was working on the Resurrection of Jesus article, and I didn't want to put all that information on the Resurrection page, reasoning that this letter probably deserves its own article, letting other people add to it, ditto Letter to the Smyrnaeans... as a bit of a heads up, it's not a good idea to call people careless without good reason. I'm not incredibly offended though; so feel free to add/edit as you wish.A J Hay 09:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why in God's name would this article be cited in the article on Ignatius of Loyola? I also notice it's not cited in the article on Bill Clinton or in the article on Gumdrops.141.70.11.36 (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]