Talk:Eridge railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

Sussex Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations

Platforms[edit]

I'm unsure of the number of platforms at Eridge and other stations on the branch. Could someone please verify these? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.239.106 (talk • contribs)

4 at Eridge, only 2 in use. Pickle 19:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of spam link[edit]

I've removed the link to the commercial website for the Huntsman public house: the rules regarding spam on Wikipedia are quite clear: "[a]dding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam." Dom Kaos (talk) 14:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've just removed the same link again - if anyone feels there is a valid reason to re-add it (i.e. that the addition is not merely for promotional purposes) please discuss it here first, so that some consensus can be reached Dom Kaos (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]