This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
The videos posted as the references kind of made me think that this settlement does not have fewer than ten residents. The videos did not specify the exact or approximate population of the village. Also, I don't think there are very many reliable sources out there telling the population of the village right now. Therefore, my conclusion is that this page should not be put in that category. Thank you. BTC 21:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Perhaps some Norwegians related to Gaahl reads this and can give an exact answer. We'll have to wait for that. __meco (talk) 21:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, we'll definitely need to wait for that. BTC 22:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, that was nice of you to take the time and look up Espedal (Fjaler) on Google Maps. Kudos on that. So, Espedal is but a valley of a few houses where Gaahl's family lives, right? I should've posted that the Espedal family owns the place, if I didn't forget. I didn't know that the settlement was just a valley, though. Thanks for that information. BTC 20:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is a valley where there are a few houses. I believe it's situated about 30 minutes by car from the main road. I don't know how many people who live there, though, but it doesn't qualify as a village. Bulgakoff (talk) 07:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's something that I understand. Thanks. BTC 19:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]