Talk:Esperanza (Enrique Iglesias song)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nkon21 (talk · contribs) 03:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. This shouldn't take too much time given the article's length. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Infobox and lead[edit]

Is this the European or US single cover? It should be labeled in the caption

I'm assuming it's used for both regions then. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrap "Los Angeles, California" in parenthesis
Flat list template is unnecessary, removing it produces the same result
"from his third studio album" → "for his third studio album"
To whom is he confessing this for?
"One reviewer lauded Iglesias' vocals" → "Upon "Esperanza"'s release, one reviewer lauded Iglesias' vocals"
"A music video for "Esperanza" was filmed in Malibu, California and directed by Emmanuel Lubezki. The music video won Video of the Year" → "Filmed in Malibu, California, the accompanying music video for "Esperanza" was directed by Emmanuel Lubezki, which won Video of the Year" with the pipe
". It also was a top-five hit in" → ", while becoming top-five hit in"

Background and composition[edit]

"at the Ocean Way Recording" → "at Ocean Way Recording"
"who previous worked on Iglesias's previous records." → "who had previously worked with Iglesias on his past records."
AGF for offline sources
"The song was later included on Iglesias'" → "The song was later included on Iglesias's"
Link AllMusic on each of its sources

Promotion and reception[edit]

Link lead single
Link Malibu, California
I suggest adding a bit more about the music video itself
"The Monitor Russell McCrory felt that" → "Russell McCrory from The Monitor felt that"
Add year of his debut single in parenthesis
I suggest tweaking wording to avoid choppy sentences
Write out the name of the tour and add the years it was held in parenthesis
"In Latin America," → "Commercially, in Latin America,"
"It reached the summit on the week" → "It reached the number one position on the chart in the week"
Wording needs to be tweaked here: "It spent four consecutive weeks in this position being replaced by "Ciega, Sordomuda" by Shakira."
"The track also reached the top of the Latin Pop Airplay chart where it also spent a total of four weeks in this position." → "The track additionally peaked atop the Latin Pop Airplay chart for four [consecutive] / [nonconsecutive] weeks." (which ever it be)

Charts[edit]

I don't think Notimex needs to be linked for every entry per MOS:OVERLINK

Track listing[edit]

~~Looks good!~~ (I forgot about this when I first looked at it, but track listing should be wrapped in quotes.)

Refs[edit]

Add trans-titles to Spanish sources
Remove publishers from Billboard refs
In ref 10, replace "videotape" with "online video"

@Nkon21: Could you please have another look at the article? I done some changes that you suggested except for overlinking AllMusic. The lack of sources on the music video makes it hard for me to write more except to expanded the synopsis a bit. Erick (talk) 02:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Magiciandude: Okay, I just did a bit of copyediting in the article. Per MOS:REFLINK, there is no problem with repeating the same link in many citations within an article, but that's not a big deal. ✓ Pass now, good work :) ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]