Talk:Esteban Solari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Esteban Solari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

=

Correction on the coach biography[edit]

There is no point in naming the previous coach when describing Solari coaching carrier. Otherwise we will need to name Esteban in the biography of the other person and so on for everyone. This space should be for information about Esteban and not for someone else please. Huminaro22 (talk) 05:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Then, add it to Mr. Bidoglio as well, and please stop removing the mention in Mr. Solari. The careers of both are linked, no ifs and no buts. --RevampedEditor (talk) 14:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed with RE - the removal of valid, sourced content is disruptive. GiantSnowman 16:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told to stop (i advised you to write a similar content in Mr. Bidoglio's page if it worried you so much), but you continue to remove the content, which the ADMINISTRATOR above these lines says it's disruptive/vandalism. Situation has been already reported, have a nice day. --RevampedEditor (talk) 07:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]