Talk:Eucharist/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Eucharist. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Eucharist as a product
User Pbritti is determined to change the introduction of the article by saying that the Eucharist is a product without any source, he hides behind himself by saying that since the article "Blessed Sacrament" said, without any source, that the Eucharist is a product, he says that he must merge it. Although it is a lie that the article "Blessed Sacrament" says that the Eucharist is a product.
He can't merge something that simply doesn't exist in the previous article.
I consider that the original introduction of the article be maintained, and that he stops insisting that the Eucharist is a product under the pretext that he must merge it just because the article "Blessed Sacrament" said that it is a product (although looking at the history of the article "Blessed Sacrament" this also never says that the Eucharist is a product)
So I don't understand why he insists that he must merge that the Eucharist is a product, when the article "Blessed Sacrament" simply did not say that, so he can't merge something that is simply not in the "Blessed Sacrament" article. Rafaelosornio (talk) 13:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Rafaelosornio: Do you have a preferred phrasing that is supported by sources? I have sourced my preferred phrasing (which you promptly reverted to "outcome", for unclear reasons). ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- There is no word supported by sources that the Eucharist is a product or an outcome, it would be best to return to the introduction that the article already had.Rafaelosornio (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- I provided two sources that use the wording I preferred. As such, the wording will be restored unless you can provide sourcing that suggests it is somehow incorrect. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia does not accept original research, you searched for those two articles in order to impose your point of view (that the Eucharist is a product), to start with the EWTN article that you put, it never says that the Eucharist is a product, and the other article on the page "stmartin-in-the -fields.org" it says that the consecrated elements are the end product of the Eucharistic Prayer. It should be discussed and compared with other sources; since no one else considers the Eucharist as a product as far as I know. Rafaelosornio (talk) 03:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- So, is there not a source, or is he cherry-picking the source? Regardless of what Pbritti says, clarifies, or reiterates to you, you seem to choose to take issue with it. IMO there is a clear lack of WP:AGF on your part, especially when you view cited and supported edits as "imposing" a point of view. Maximilian775 (talk) 04:17, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia does not accept original research, you searched for those two articles in order to impose your point of view (that the Eucharist is a product), to start with the EWTN article that you put, it never says that the Eucharist is a product, and the other article on the page "stmartin-in-the -fields.org" it says that the consecrated elements are the end product of the Eucharistic Prayer. It should be discussed and compared with other sources; since no one else considers the Eucharist as a product as far as I know. Rafaelosornio (talk) 03:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- I provided two sources that use the wording I preferred. As such, the wording will be restored unless you can provide sourcing that suggests it is somehow incorrect. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- There is no word supported by sources that the Eucharist is a product or an outcome, it would be best to return to the introduction that the article already had.Rafaelosornio (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
@Rafaelosornio: You said no sources said something and then I gave you sources. Are you confused regarding what this article is about? This article is about a.) the rite of the Eucharist, defined in The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church as the mechanism that "conveyed to the believer the Body and Blood of Christ" where many Christians consider bread and wine "transformed" or transubstantiated into the Body and Blood of Christ; and b.) the product of said rite, defined by The Maryknoll Catholic Dictionary as the Body and Blood of Christ consecrated from bread and wine. The b definition was folded into the article as a result of a merge discussion. If you can identify why we should both ignore sources I have provided and indicate alternate phrasing that explicitly acknowledges the expanded coverage of this article, please do. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- If I remember correctly neither this article nor the one on "Blessed Sacrament" the source of "The Maryknoll Catholic Dictionary" is placed.Rafaelosornio (talk) 04:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Rafaelosornio: Yes, I am demonstrating that there are multiple sources available on this. I can add these additional sources, but you've removed sources when I've added them before. Will you remove them again if I add them? ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:29, 25 August 2023 (UTC)