Talk:Eudonia
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merger proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was No consensus to merge due to lack of participation. In addition, articles about species are generally presumed notable, so a merge may not be appropriate. There are many species of Eudonia (can see 50+ listed in the article) and each seems to have its own article.(non-admin closure) --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
I propose that Eudonia vinasalis be merged into Eudonia. I think that the content in the Eudonia vinasalis article can easily be explained in the context of Eudonia, and the Eudonia article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Eudonia vinasalis will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Ausrichter (talk) 23:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eudonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006084857/http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx to http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)