Talk:Eugster/Frismag

This page was proposed for deletion by Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) on 2 May 2010 with the comment:
Fails WP:CORP

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Notability[edit]

Eugster/Frismag is one of the world's largest producers of coffee machines. My main source is the German-language article "Eugster Frismag: Die Perle vom Bodensee" from the Swiss business magazine "Bilanz", which in my opinion is a quite reliable secondary source. As I've now integrated the source as citation, I think that for the time being this should be enough to show notability. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]