Jump to content

Talk:Eumedonia eumedon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename?

[edit]

@Andy M. Wang and Fgt7: Following the edits made by Fgt7 in 2014, the page title doesn't match with the text in the article. Should we rename it? Fgt7, do you have a source for the "molecular studies"? Thanks,  SchreiberBike | ⌨  00:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • >the page title doesn't match with the text in the article. Should we rename it?
YES
Eumedonia is a valid genus, the title must be Eumedonia eumedon
  • >do you have a source for the "molecular studies"?
YES, see the next article:
Talavera, G., Lukhtanov, V.A., Pierce, N.E. & Vila, R. (2012):
Establishing criteria for higher-level classification using molecular data: the systematics of Polyommatus blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Cladistics (2012) 1–27. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00421.x
  • Besides, it must replace el text " The larvae feed on Geranium species" by "The larvae feed Geraniaceae species (genera Geranium and Erodium)
Regards— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgt7 (talkcontribs) 21:26 2016-11-02 (UTC)
@Fgt7: Thank you for the reference. I made the changes and will start the process to rename the article. Feel free to edit further.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  23:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 November 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 23:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Plebejus eumedonEumedonia eumedon – In 2014 the article text was changed so that Eumedonia eumedon was listed as the name and Plebejus eumedon was listed as a synonym. The article was not moved at that time. I noticed the mismatch and requested a technical move. That was contested (see discussion here). Following further discussion immediately above, I added a reference to the article and proposed this move. Thank you.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  19:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.