Talk:Eurasian crag martin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleEurasian crag martin is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starEurasian crag martin is part of the Crag martins series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 5, 2020.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 11, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 25, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
July 8, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Eurasian Crag Martin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Redtigerxyz Talk 16:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Good and relevant illustrations
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Please format the references uniformly, at some places: "p./pp." is used (ref 20), at others (ref 16-7) ": 660–661".
  • I think it's mos for books to use p/pp and journals left bare. Certainly the citebook template displays pages with p/pp, and citejournal doesn't. However one book ref was missing pp, and one was badly formatted, fixed now
  • Ref 18 does not date of publication.
  • Added December 2007 (most recent available)
  • All references should have title, author, publisher, date of publication, pages (if applicable).
  • I think I've added missing publishers now

--Redtigerxyz Talk 16:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for reviewing, let me know if I missed anything, or if there are other problems Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flying speed[edit]

"The flight speed has been measured at 9.9 m/s(32.5 ft/s), less than the roughly 11 m/s (36 ft/s) typical for hirundines". This is only about 40 to 45 mph is it not? This would make Eurasian Crag Martins slower than champion human sprinters. There is no context to this speed. Is this max speed in a short burst, or the average speed on a long flight, or when they are carrying mud to the nest. What is an typical hirundine? I would guess that swifts zoom around very much faster than this going on the whistling and whizzing noises of the air as they circle about. Snowman (talk) 16:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I make the crag martin nearer 22 mph. Are you sure about your human speed, that equates to running 100 m in less than 6 seconds (this has similar to the birds)? The paper says that that the speeds are measured on any sufficiently long and straight flights, and assumed to be migration speeds, so they are averages (average migration added to article now). The paper considered four other hirundine species from three different genera (all the species available in the study area), so I would have thought that justified "typical". Swifts are not hirundines, or even passerines, so not relevant to the comparison, although the three species studied in the paper actually had similar speeds to the hirundines. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Birds appear to be fast, but most small birds on longish flights do not maintain continous wing beats, but intersperse flapping with glides or closed wings to save energy. The truly fast species are those like ducks and waders, large birds which use powered flight most of the time Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
9.9 m/s = 99 m in 10 seconds = approx 100 m in 10.1 seconds. 1700 in about 170 seconds or 170/60 mins or 2.83 mins = about 60/2.83 mph = about 22 mph. Snowman (talk) 10:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Behavioural Ecology and Notes on Improvement[edit]

The introduction of Eurasian crag martin can be shortened by cutting out the information that has already been stated in the sections that follow. The contents largely follow the general format, which proceed from taxonomy, description, distribution and behavior to references, cited texts and external links. However, there are only two subsections dedicated to behaviors: breeding and feeding. The breeding section talks particularly about nesting sites, hatching process and parental care. I would add more details about how sexual selection and competition take place and how sexual behaviors adapt and evolve with evolutionary time. It may also be a good idea to add other behavioral topics like social communication, family conflicts, cooperation and competition. Lastly, the article talks about the status of Eurasian crag martin in the world. However, it might be better if the date of the datum presented was included so readers would know if the information is up to date. Tianyi Cai (talk) 12:29, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


2 ==> 3 ?[edit]

The intro says It can be confused with the other two species in its genus, but is larger than both. But the Genus article lists four species. --Ettrig (talk) 15:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eurasian crag martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eurasian crag martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Dead link in foot note[edit]

Footnote #20 has a dead URL:

"The Irish List" (PDF). Irish Rare Birds Committee. December 2018. Retrieved 2 February 2020

Noleander (talk) 22:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Washington University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Fall term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]