Talk:Europa: The Last Battle

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Europa: The Last Battle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Discrimination Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Film: Nordic

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish history Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

746 minutes?

Is the stated length really correct? If so that would make this film over 12 hours in length, surpassing even Paint Drying (which, no doubt, has far more artistic value than this film).

I get that a lot of far-rightists are NEET-types who have _way_ too much free time on their hands (and thus would be more willing to make, and/or watch, overly-long propaganda pieces). But even so, 746 minutes seems awfully excessive. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:CEB1 (talk) 04:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb says 12 hours, 26 minutes. A few other non-RSs mention that it's "12 hours" and a "ten-part web series", so as dubious as it sounds, the length appears to be accurate. Schazjmd (talk) 13:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Neutral

This article should be marked as no neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.10.142.196 (talk) 13:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a thing. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 23:10, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently it is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view Noticerwhonotices (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Neutral point of view" is. "No neutral" isn't. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 22:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noticerwhonotices has been blocked per WP:NONAZIS. Isi96 (talk) 22:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article only quotes Biased Sources

The article relies on quotes from Biased sources to "Prove" its point. 222.108.156.194 (talk) 00:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Wikipedia is biased against bullshit conspiracy theories and fraudulent pseudohistory. Red Rock Canyon (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

🫵😭 148.69.23.76 (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, yup. That's how English Wikipedia work. RamanaEmiliz (talk) 16:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Number of the source out of order

Hi!

i'm fairly new on this so it may be nothing, but the sources appear to me as out of order, for example at the beginning going from 2 to 3 to 11. It seems to be the result of previous editing and sentence deletion, but it could be fixed and the article would look nicer. ZenZeppelin (talk) 14:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ZenZeppelin That's because there's a bundled citation in the lead. Isi96 (talk) 14:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]