Talk:European Interoperability Framework

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Systems

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Enterprise modelling.

[Untitled]

I changed the "lobbying for open standards" to "lobbying for proprietary software" since the debate is pretty much about how the EIFv2 draft turned from something in favour or open standards, to something in favour of proprietary software.

See evidences here, http://www.fsfe.org/projects/os/eifv2.en.html and some articles debating about that, i.e. http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?blogid=14&entryid=2620

Dear authors, I propose following changes:

As EIF 1.0 was not a part of the EU directive (as defined by What are EU directives), I would change the sentence to:

"The EIF 1.0 was issued under the Interoperable Delivery of European eGovernment Services to public Administrations, Businesses and Citizens programme (IDABC)

As EIF version 1.0 has not been ratified by the European Parliament, I would change the sentence to:

"EIF Version 1.0 was published in November 2004".

reference 3 leads to an obsolete page. I will update the link with the following. I will also correct the misspelled EIF in the second paragraph.

--ISA programme (talk) 15:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changes done as outlined above. --ISA programme (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]