Jump to content

Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 1963

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Norway voting

[edit]

The Norweigan jury themselves suggest that Katie Boyle comes back to Norway at the end. The reason why Norway changed their numbers is due to a misunderstanding of the rules: initially, each jury should contain 20 members. This was later changed to 10 members, a fact that NRK missed (Sweden made the same mistake and had 20 jury members). When Norway was first called up, they were not done counting their votes, and the first result was not the final one.

Fair use rationale for Image:ESC1963.jpg

[edit]

Image:ESC1963.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

China in the 1963 Eurovision Song Contest ?

[edit]

I can't find a reference to this, and it has been added into the Eurovision Song Contest article as well. This seems somewhat at odds with the EBU rules. Am I missing something?AlexandrDmitri (talk) 11:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:JdeJ for reverting this vandalism on both pages. AlexandrDmitri (talk) 12:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eurovision Song Contest 1963. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Serbo - Croatian language

[edit]

Do not exist