Jump to content

Talk:Eva Perón/Archive5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OR?

The following is unsourced and over-emotive in phrasing etc. I'm assuming that it was not present when the article got GA status. Can it be fixed?

At the time of Perón's imprisonment, Eva was still merely an actress. She had no political clout with the various labor unions that supported Perón, and it is claimed that she was not well-liked within Perón's inner circle, nor was she liked by many within the film and radio business at this point. When Juan Perón was imprisoned, Eva Duarte was suddenly disenfranchised. In reality, the massive rally that freed Perón from prison was organized by the various unions, such as General Labor Confederation, or CGT as they came to be known. To this day, the date of 17 October is something of a holiday for the Justicialist Party in Argentina (celebrated as Día de la Lealtad, or "Loyalty Day"). What would follow was shocking and nearly unheard of. The well connected and politically rising star, Juan Peron, actually married Eva. Despite Eva's childhood illegitimacy, and having an uncertain reputation, Peron was in love with Eva, and her loyal devotion to him even while he had been under arrest touched him deeply, and so he married her, providing a respectability she had never known. Eva and Juan were married discreetly in a civil ceremony in Junín on 18 October 1945 and in a church wedding on 9 December 1945.

Many of the adjectives need to go, as does much of the commentary. The grammar is wrong in places and statements such as "it is claimed" are simply not acceptable without a source. It is pointless me fiddling with it unless there is a source to work off. - Sitush (talk) 15:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

I was the primary editor at the time that the GA status was granted, and, no, this isn't how it appeared at the time the status was granted. Such is Wikipedia; anyone can edit it. This section is now a mess. However, with regard to it being "emotive," that's inevitable given that she is one of the most emotional figures in Latin American history. She's kind of a Latin American version of Marilyn Monroe, Princess Diana, and Mother Teresa, rolled into one. If that sounds confusing and unlikely, well, welcome to the world of Evita! (Seriously. Some people have claimed that she is such an emotional and mythologized figure that it is impossible to be objective about her or to know her true story.) Andrew Parodi (talk) 11:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Eva Perón. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:30, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 17 September 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 00:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)


(non-admin closure)

WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:COMMONNAME. Most topics listed in Evita is about Eva Perón. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Oppose per WP:AT – The proposed title is not in the encyclopaedic register, and is too vague. "Evita" can refer to many other things, currently listed at that page. RGloucester 18:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Per WP:NCP. DrKiernan (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose per being an encyclopedia not a pop blog. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose – seems too informal in tone. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose, per all of the above. Don't cry for me, Wikipedia. Randy Kryn 12:58, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Eva Perón. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Fascism

The section on "Allegations of fascism" is important. However it falls short of the required encyclopaedic standard. Allegations that she was a fascist are quoted, but no objective academic or historical analysis given. It seems to me that she was a fascist, as her husband and party were fascist. There wasn't much difference politically between the Peron's and Mussolini, or Franco.101.98.74.13 (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Indeed, the analysis falls far short of an encyclopædic standard. The section has a certain amount to say about antisemitism, but this isn't an essential feature of fascism - it's what set the nazis apart from their fellow fascists. None of what's said of the accusations of fascism appears to indicate their accusers thought them antisemitic, so focussing on that as their defense is misguided. Mussolini initially treated Italy's Jews no worse than the rest of Italy's people, only turning against them when he found himself dependent on his nazi ally. It is his movement that historically defines fascism (both by being first and by inventing the name), with the central theme of strength through unity and "if you're not with us you're against us". Any analysis of whether the Perons were fascists needs to address the ideological and organisational kinship, if any, between their regime and the (other) fascist regimes, focussing on what these had in common, not on the one feature of naziism that most glaringly set it apart from other flavours of fascism. The final sentence of the section briefly manages to mention that Peronism wasn't totalitarian, which is far more relevant than the more extensive treatment of antisemitism. It remains that there is no discussion of their ideology or of whether they regarded their political opponents as a "loyal opposition" or as traitors to be stamped out. Perhaps the academic literature on the subject is equally bereft. Even if it is, the present section gives a disproportionate amount of space to their (more or less irrelevant) lack of antisemitism. 84.215.9.172 (talk) 18:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

One sentence reads, "With nearly a third of Argentina's population of Spanish descent, it seemed natural for Argentina to have diplomatic relations with Spain." "Seemed natural" to whom? Could the authors please specify and footnote their source? ~ Peter S. Scholtes

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eva Perón. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)