Jump to content

Talk:Eve of the Daleks/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TheDoctorWho (talk · contribs) 05:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 22:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC) I'll take this.[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Under devolopement "Zooom" should be spelt "Zoom"  Done
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Tell me about "Sanity" and "Thinkbox"
    @OlifanofmrTennant: Sanity is used in the same method that WP:RSPAMAZON would be used. It's simply verifying a non-controversial and undisputed release date. I replaced Thinkbox with BARB. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Selected 10 at random sources all check out
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the ytral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Alt text needed for lead image  Done
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: